Thank you for your interest in the benchmark study of
TigerGraph and Amazon Neptune

On our test data sets (a synthetic graph and a real-world Twitter graph with 1.47B edges),

  • Data Loading Speed: TigerGraph loads 21x to 58x faster than Neptune.
  • Storage: Amazon Neptune needs 8.0x to 9.6x more disk storage for the same input graph data.
  • 1-hop and 2-hop Graph Queries : TigerGraph is at least 10x faster for 1-hop twitter data set and at least 57x faster for 2-hops for both data sets.
  • 3-hop and 6-hop queries: For 3-hop queries, Amazon Neptune returns out of memory (OOM) error on 17 out of 20 trials. Neptune could not finish 6-hop queries. 
  • Analytic Queries (PageRank, Connected Components, etc.): Not Supported on Neptune, supported in TigerGraph.

 

Download